Differential Diagnosis: Athletic Pubalgia

In the next installment of the Differential Diagnosis Series for MedBridge Education, we are going to take a look at the difficult and complex diagnosis of Athletic Pubalgia…

Pathophysiology and Anatomy

Athletic pubalgia is a catch-all term for soft-tissue pathology in the groin, lower abdominal, pubic, and medial thigh regions. This pathology can be secondary to tendinopathies, osteitis pubis, posterior inguinal wall insufficiency, and nerve entrapments in the inguinal region.3

It can involve the following anatomical structures:3,4,8

  1. Rectus abdominis
  2. Rectus femoris
  3. Sartorius
  4. Internal oblique
  5. External oblique
  6. Transverse abdominal muscles/tendons/sheaths
  7. Inguinal ligament
  8. Adductor group of muscles (adductor longus, adductor brevis, adductor magnus)
  9. Gracilis
  10. Pectineus
  11. Iliopsoas
  12. Pubic symphysis
  13. Pubic ramus

Epidemiology

Athletic pubalgia is a common injury found in athletes and the general population alike.

Athletic pubalgia most commonly occurs in sports requiring cutting, pivoting or frequent acceleration/deceleration (ice hockey, football, rugby). Amongst field-based athletes (soccer, rugby, lacrosse, etc.), roughly 10% of injuries are due to groin pain,6 whereas these injuries account for approximately 2-5% of all sports medicine injuries.7 Chronic groin pain ranks as the fourth most common injury in the Rugby Federal Union.

In ice hockey, groin pain is an all too common occurrence as well. A retrospective case series over the course of six National Hockey League (NHL) seasons found a total of 617 groin/abdominal injuries, with a recurrence rate of 23.5%.1

Subjective Findings

Patients typically report the following symptoms:4

  1. Deep groin or abdominal-related pain with exertion, which is more proximal or intense than an adductor or iliopsoas strain
  2. Point tenderness at the superior-lateral pubis
  3. Pain is typically unilateral, but can advance to bilateral
  4. Pain is typically relieved upon rest, but returns with sports-related activities
  5. Pain is exacerbated by kicking, side-stepping, cutting, or sit-ups
  6. Some patients report pain with coughing and sneezing
  7. Males may report testicular pain

Objective Findings

As to the physical examination, the literature supports several findings:5

  1. A resisted sit-up or crunch with palpation of the inferolateral edge of the distal rectus abdominis may re-create symptoms
  2. The pubic tubercle and pubic symphysis are painful in up to 22% of patients upon palpation
  3. Tenderness to palpation of the proximal adductor musculature (adductor longus, gracilis, pectineus)
  4. Resisted adduction in flexion and extension may elicit discomfort
  5. Limited A/PROM (most often, hip internal rotation, external rotation, and abduction)3

Special Tests

As with most hip pathologies, special testing for athletic pubalgia is not robust enough to significantly change a clinician’s clinical reasoning with regards to diagnosis.

However, a systematic review with meta-analysis conducted by Reiman and colleagues9 has discovered three tests (see table below) that allow to rule in the condition with confidence. As to screening and ruling out the pathology, these tests do not provide enough information due to their low sensitivity and high negative likelihood ratios.

Source: Reiman and colleagues9

Risk Factors

Two recent systematic reviews discuss risk factors for developing athletic pubalgia in an athletic population (see details in a table below).

Previous injury to the groin region is the most predictive factor in developing this disorder.

Modifiable risk factors include reduced gluteal strength (adductor and abductor), which makes sense given the proposed mechanism of injury. Higher levels of competition and less sport-specific training have also been associated with higher incidence of groin pain.

Athletic Pubalgia and FAI

Although a diagnosis of athletic pubalgia is complicated, its presence does not prevent your patient from having any concomitant pathologies.

Econompoulos and colleagues performed a retrospective case series to determine the prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in athletes undergoing surgical treatment for athletic pubalgia. They found radiographic evidence of FAI in at least one hip in 37 of 43 patients (86%).2

In a prospective case series by Weir et al., 94% of 34 athletes with long-standing adductor related pain had radiological findings consistent with femoroacetabular impingement.11

These findings speak to the need to fully investigate all logical differential diagnoses that may affect the patient’s plan of care or prognosis. Ruling in one condition with confidence, does not preclude that patient from having another condition that may contribute to their pain.

Athletic pubalgia should typically be considered a diagnosis of exclusion, as there are often concomitant diagnosable pathologies present. It is important to not only rule out FAI (as previously discussed), but also acetabular labral tears and other intra-articular disorders of the hip. The low back cannot be ignored either as it also has the ability to refer pain into this region. Once these other pathologies have been ruled out, knowing the epidemiology, risk factors, and specific special tests associated with AP can improve the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Differential Diagnosis: Athletic Pubalgia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s